Muhammad in the Bible?



David Wood’s article can be found here:


Christians have tried their best to refute the fact that Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is the last prophet mentioned in their massively corrupt books. However, the reality is that they have not even touched 20% of these prophecies. Even the figure of 20% is a large estimate. Christians only circle around Deuteronomy’s Prophet like Moses as they feel they can easily twist it for their own needs and the spirit of truth. Attempts to reject these prophecies have been refuted well and in great detail:


David Wood discusses the following prophecies:


1) Deuteronomy’s Prophet like Moses.


David Wood makes the following comment:

First, the passage says that God will raise up a prophet like Moses, because the Israelites didn’t want to speak directly with God. The Israelites said, “Let me not hear again the voice of the LORD my God … that I die not,” and God replied, “They have well spoken that which they have spoken.” Hence, when verse 18:15 is taken in context, we see that the Jews were asking for a mediator, someone to stand between them and God just as Moses did. While Muhammad could certainly be viewed as a mediator, the passage seems to fit more comfortably if the Prophet is Jesus. Muhammad claimed to be a mediator between Gabriel and man (giving us a series of mediators), whereas Jesus was a mediator directly between God and man: “For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time” (1 Timothy 2:5-6).The important part has been highlighted. David Wood feels that it makes more sense if it is applied to Prophet Jesus (peace be upon him). For that matter, he will have to bring the real Jesus and not the fictional Jesus of the Bible:

Next, Moses says that God will raise up a prophet “from the midst of thee.” Since he is talking to Israelites, it sounds as if God is telling them that he will raise up a prophet from the midst of Israel. In any case, Muhammad surely wasn’t raised up from the midst of Jews. Jesus, on the other hand, was born and raised in Israel, so the context again fits more comfortably if Moses is referring to Jesus.The Jews lived in Madina in the midst of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). We must remember that the Jews elsewhere lived under the Roman rule and the ones that refused to live under occupation were of the highest rank; their pride did not allow them to live under captivity. The Jews around Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) were among the most important people of the time, far higher in rank to those under captivity. This prophecy suits Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) very well.

David Wood also debates as to what brethren actually means. He agrees that Edomites have also been referred to as brethren but insists that it refers to the Israelis in this situation. The reality is quite different. As per Genesis 49:10, the last Prophet was to be someone from outside Israel. Besides, the jewishness of Prophet Jesus (peace be upon him) is also in doubt; the Bible speaks against it.

David Wood states the following:

Here the phrase “like unto Moses” suggests a prophet who would speak with God face to face and perform signs and wonders “in the sight of all Israel.” Muhammad doesn’t fit either of these criteria.

Moses also does not fit this criteria as allegedly God showed his back parts to Moses; it was not a face-to-face conversation. Besides, the Bible says that no one can see God and live. Maybe Moses was also facing the other way!

For more information on this prophecy, see the rebuttal to Deuteronomy Deductions.

As for Jesus, who is he? Is the Biblical version of Jesus authentic?


2) The comforter.


David Wood repeats the same old points of Christian missionaries. He seems to be unaware of the rebuttals by the Muslims. The article can be made lengthy by copying from those rebuttals but that would be useless and much like a trick used by Sam Shamoun. Links are provided below and if and when David Wood reads them, he would feel embarrassed for making the claims he made in this article of his.

In the Gospel of John: Muhammad is mentioned by the name and was foretold in the Gospel of John. This is a must read article!  It proves that Jesus peace be upon him predicted for the Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him to come after him.

The Aramaic Bible predicts the coming of Muhammad by the exact word.

Further proofs from the Aramaic Bible Society.   A very good proof from the Aramaic Bible Society web site regarding Muhammad’s name mentioned in the Greek Bible.  This is a must visit link!!.

Jesus told the Jews that GOD Almighty will take His Kingdom from them and give it to the Muslims.

My detailed rebuttal to a Christian rebuttal about Muhammad was foretold by Jesus.  I addressed all of their rebuttal points and refuted them.  The article also talks about the 24,000 books that the current Bible’s 66 books came from, and how that makes the current 66 chosen books extremely unreliable and doubtful.David Wood feels that the spirit of truth was the Holy Spirit promised to the disciples. The above links answer that misconception very well and if we see the Bible carefully, we see something else. Jesus says that they would be guided into all truths but the disciples were not guided unto any truth (Galatians 2:11-14, 1 Corinthians 1:11-13).This link is also a must see:

David Wood has one genuine concern regarding these prophecies. He states that if the Muslims believe in the prophecies in John, then they must also believe that Jesus is God, he got crucified etc. The reality is again not as he believes:


The lie of the crucifixion!

(According to the early Christians)

The New Testament confirms the Apocalypse of Peter which claims that Jesus never died on the cross!

Also according to several of Jesus’ Disciples’ early writings!

Jesus never got crucified according to Islam and the early Christians’ doctrines!


Basically, Muslims do not believe in the Bible. Some parts might be true but it is difficult to verify which parts are true and which are false. However, the prophecies of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) have been confirmed by history, facts, the Quran and Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) himself. Muslims still do not call it the word of God. These prophecies are meant for the Christians to realize the truth.

David Wood gives eight reasons why the spirit of truth is not Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). All of them are explained in the following link and above links contain additional information on this matter:In the Gospel of John: Muhammad is mentioned by the name and was foretold in the Gospel of John.

Those who apply this prophecy to the Holy Spirit should be ashamed of themselves!


3) Covenant with Abraham.


David Wood uses the same old refuted argument that the covenant was not made with Ishmael but with Isaac. However, if we see it in detail, the covenant was to be forever. Paul clearly aborted circumcision and many other points of the covenant. The Muslims hold on to that covenant. Ishmaelite nation has fulfilled this prophecy whereas Trinitarians have rejected this covenant completely.


Secondly, we see that the lying scribes (Jeremiah 8:8) switched the names for their own evil purposes.


How can Isaac be the only begotten son when Ishmael was 14 years older than him? This is clear evidence that the scribes (Jeremiah 8:8) switched the names of the two.


The “great nation” of Ishmael and its definition in the Bible.


4) Prophecy in Deuteronomy 33.


David Wood seems to be very new into the field of writing against Islam. If that is not true, then he must not have seen If none of the two are correct, then he is a pure deceiver. All of the claims he make have already been refuted by the Muslims:


The emigration of the Muslims to Madina was foretold in the Bible.

The story of the 10,000 Muslims who liberated Mecca (Paran) in the Bible.

See the Proof that “Paran” in the Bible is “Mecca”.  5) Prophecy in Isaiah 21 Isaiah saw a vision of two riders.

“And he saw a chariot [with] a couple of horsemen, a chariot of asses, [and] a chariot of camels ..” (Isaiah 21:7)

Who was the rider upon the ass? Every Sunday school student will tell us that this was a prophecy of Jesus (peace be upon him), as stated in John:

“And Jesus, when he had found a young ass, sat thereon; as it is written,” (John 12:14)

but who is the promised prophet who would ride the camel? If it is not Muhammad (peace be upon him) then this prophecy has yet to be fulfilled. Let us read on…

“And, behold, here cometh a chariot of men, [with] a couple of horsemen. And he answered and said, Babylon is fallen, is fallen; and all the graven images of her gods he hath broken unto the ground.” (Isaiah 21:9)

Babylon did indeed fall before Islam and the Islamic nation under the guidance of Muhammad (peace be upon him) did indeed succeed in eradicating the worship of idols from Babylon replacing it with the worship of God alone. In fact, the Muslims were the only believers in the God of Isaiah to ever succeed in fulfilling this prophesy.

“The burden upon Arabia …” (Isaiah 21:13)

What does the word “burden” mean? Let us ask the Scofield Study Bible:

“…which also means an oracle is a word sometimes used in the prophetical writings to indicate a divine message of judgment” (Scofield Study Bible New King James Version, note 1, p. 792)

So the Muslims of Arabia (and subsequently Muslims everywhere) would be assigned the burden of God’s message.

“The inhabitants of the land of Tema brought water to him that was thirsty, they prevented with their bread him that fled. For they fled from the swords, from the drawn sword, and from the bent bow, and from the grievousness of war” (Isaiah 21:14-15)

In “The Dictionary of the Bible,” bearing the Nihil Obstat, Imprimatur, and Imprimi Potest (official Church seals of approval), by John McKenzi, we read that “Tema” is:

“a place name and tribal name of Arabia; a son of Ishmael…. The name survives in Teima, an oasis of the part of the Arabian desert called the Nefud in N Central Arabia.”

This word, Tema, is the name of the ninth son of Ishmael (the father of the Arabs), in Genesis 25:13-15 we read:

“And these are the names of the sons of Ishmael, by their names, according to their generations: the firstborn of Ishmael, Nebajoth; and Kedar, and Adbeel, and Mibsam, And Mishma, and Dumah, and Massa, Hadar, and Tema, Jetur, Naphish, and Kedemah” (Genesis 25:13-15).

Strong’s concordance tells us that this name was also applied to the land settled by Tema the son of Ishmael. It goes on to explain how this word is “probably of foreign derivation”. Indeed, this word, Teima, is an Arabic word which means “Barren desert”. It remains the name of a city in the Arabian peninsula just north of “Al-Madinah Al-Munawarah,” or “Madinah” for short (Please see Map 1, page 491). Muhammad (peace be upon him) and his companions were given sanction to migrate. They departed Makkah during the night and left all of their possessions behind. Upon reaching Madinah they were greeted by its citizens with open arms and Muhammad (peace be upon him) assigned each one of the Muhajireen (citizens of Makkah) to one of the Ansar (citizens of Madinah) to house and feed them until they could strike out on their own. This became the first year of the Arab “Hijra” (Emigration) calendar used in Islamic countries to this day.

“For thus hath the LORD said unto me, Within a year, according to the years of an hireling, and all the glory of Kedar shall fail. And the residue of the number of archers, the mighty men of the children of Kedar, shall be diminished: for the LORD God of Israel hath spoken [it].” (Isaiah 21:16-17)

Kedar is the second son of Ishmael, the father of the Arabs:

“And these are the names of the sons of Ishmael, by their names, according to their generations: the firstborn of Ishmael, Nebajoth; and Kedar, and Adbeel, and Mibsam.” (Genesis 25:13)

Kedar is also synonymous with all of Arabia in general, as in Ezekiel:

“Arabia, and all the princes of Kedar.” (Ezekiel 27:21)

The Arabs of Makkah, the capital of the paganistic tribes of Arabia of the day, were indeed defeated by the Muslims in the second year after their forced immigration from Makkah to Madinah (The Hijra). This victory signaled the turning point for Islam and a transition from a position of weakness to one of power and victory .

It should be pointed out here that, as mentioned at the beginning of this chapter, the children of Israel, from the tribe of Levi, were distinctly aware of this prophesy. Indeed this is the very reason why they had begun to immigrate from the lush and fertile pastures of their holy land of Israel to the barren parched deserts of Arabia, specifically to Madinah and the surrounding areas of Khaibar, Tema, and others. Because they knew that this is where the final prophet would appear. As mentioned above, these children of the Jews were constantly threatening the Arab inhabitants of Madinah (the tribes of Al-Aws and Al-Kazraj) with his impending arrival and how they would follow him and, through his leadership, they would utterly destroy these Arabs. They had hoped that this prophet would be from their tribe and that their presence in this location might facilitate this hope.

When their awaited prophet finally did come, they rejected him. They wanted a Jewish prophet from their own tribe and not an Arab from the sons of Ishmael. Thus, they allowed their pride to come between them and the truth which they recognized. However, their efforts were not totally in vain. So continuous were their efforts in threatening the inhabitants of Madinah with the final prophet’s imminent arrival that when Muhammad (peace be upon him) finally did come, the inhabitants of Madinah immediately recognized him and hastened to follow him before the Jews. These inhabitants of Madinah would later become among those very first followers of Muhammad (peace be upon him) who would one year later go on to fulfill the prophesy of Isaiah by defeating the “mighty men of Kedar” in the very first battle of the Islamic nation, the battle of Badr.

As the prophesy requires, one year after prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) and his followers escaped from the torture and persecution of the people of Kedar and emigrated to Madinah, the men of Makkah decided to once and for all put an end to Muhammad (peace be upon him) and his followers. They assembled an army consisting of 750 footmen and 200 horsemen, all of their very best fighters, and all very well armed. The leaders of this army consisted of the majority of the leaders of Kedar (see chapter ten). They were confident of victory and bragged that after this massacre they would be feared throughout all of Arabia.

The Muslims heard of this amassing of troops and prepared as best they could. They collected 313 footmen with two horses and seventy camels. The Muslims fought long and hard with the men of Kedar and were finally granted victory. This battle ended in the death of these leaders of Kedar and a resounding victory for the Muslims.

In this battle, only fourteen Muslims and seventy pagans from Kedar were killed. Twenty four of those who died from Kedar were their leaders. In addition, seventy others from Kedar were taken as prisoners and later ransomed back to their people (for more see chapter ten).

This was the great turning point for the Islamic nation. This battle could be said to have been the beginning of the end for the reign of idolatry and paganism within the land of Arabia. This Muslim nation would then go on to expand to many other nations until it spread from Spain to China, fulfilling many more prophesies in the Bible, including Daniel 2:44, Genesis 15:18-21, and many others.

An unfortunate misconception which has managed to creep into many Western beliefs is that Islam was only spread through force and the sword. Today, however, this notion is beginning to be recognized for the absurdity that it was. A Christian missionary, Sir Thomas W. Arnold says:

“…of any organized attempt to force the acceptance of Islam on the non-Muslim population, or of any systematic persecution intended to stamp out the Christian religion, we hear nothing. Had the caliphs chosen to adopt either course of action, they might have swept away Christianity as easily as Ferdinand and Isabella drove Islam out of Spain, or Louis XIV made Protestantism penal in France, or the Jews were kept out of England for 350 years. The Eastern Churches in Asia were entirely cut off from communion with the rest of Christendom throughout which no one would have been found to lift a finger on their behalf, as heretical communions. So that the very survival of these Churches to the present day is a strong proof of the generally tolerant attitude of Mohammedan [sic] governments towards them” (The Preaching of Islam, A History of the Propagation of the Muslim Faith, Sir Thomas W. Arnold, Westminster A. Constable & Co., London, 1896, p. 80).

“Against unbelievers he (Muhammad) enjoined his followers to undertake a holy warefare, but only when attacked. The earlier Moslem[sic] leaders did not try to impose their faith upon other nations” (The History of Christianity in the Light of Modern Knowledge, A Collective Work, Harcourt Brace and co., p. 520)

Muslims did indeed wage many wars, just as many Jews and Christians did both before and after this. Muslims waged their wars in self-defense or in order to abolish idolatry, tyranny, slavery, and oppression. Muslims were commanded to not attack those who did not attack them, to not cut down a fruit tree, to not kill the animals, to not take the people’s property, to not harm women or children or old people so long as they did not fight with them, and to not burn crops.

When they were victorious, the Muslims were commanded not to destroy the churches nor the synagogues, nor to force the people to convert to Islam. The people were allowed to continue to practice their religion without persecution or being forced to convert (Compare for example with Numbers 31, and Deuteronomy 20. Please also compare with the great Spanish inquisitions).

“There is no compulsion in religion. The right path is henceforth distinct from misguidance” (The noble Qur’an, Al-Bakarah(2):256.)

If Islam was indeed spread by the sword and not by its spiritual appeal, then how do we explain, for example, the fact that Islam is the religion of the majority of the people of the country of Indonesia even though no Muslim army ever set foot on their land and they can by no stretch of the imagination be labeled as Arabs? The only contact these people ever had with Islam was through Muslim traders who passed through their lands.

If the truth were to be known, in almost every single battle the Muslims ever participated in, they were almost always vastly outnumbered. For example, when the Muslims finally overthrew the pagan Byzantine superpower in the battle of Al-Yarmook of the year 636 C.E., the Muslim army consisted of 40,000 fighters verses 200,000 solders in the Byzantine army. So although many historians may like to attribute the fall of this superpower to any number of factors such as claiming that they were taxed and weary from previous battles with the Romans, (while not claiming that the Muslims were taxed and weary from their previous battles), and although they refuse to believe that this victory could have come from the Almighty, still, one needs to wonder if this victory were not through divine intervention then how do we explain the fact that an ill-equipped army of Bedouin sheep herders who were outnumbered more than four to one could so resoundingly defeat one of the two “superpowers” of their age?

“The extinction of race consciousness as between Muslims is one of the outstanding achievements of Islam and in the contemporary world. There is, as it happens, a crying need for the propagation of this Islamic virtue.” (The Genuine Islam, Vol. 1, George Bernard Shaw, No. 81936.)

“I have always held the religion of Muhammad in high estimation because of its wonderful vitality. It is the only religion which appears to me to possess that assimilating capacity to the changing phase of existence which can make itself appeal to every age. I have studied him-the wonderful man and in my opinion far from being an anti-Christ, he must be called the Savior of Humanity. I believe that if a man like him were to assume the dictatorship of the modern world, he would succeed in solving its problems in a way that would bring it the much needed peace and happiness: I have prophesied about the faith of Muhammad that it would be acceptable to the Europe of tomorrow as it is beginning to be acceptable to the Europe of today.” (Hamilton Gibb, Whither Islam, London, 1932, p. 379).



6) False Prophets.


 Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) also prophesied of false prophets to come who would deceive many. We see that this is the case today; many people follow cults of false prophets. David Wood also quotes Paul in this section of his. If he know the reality of Paul, he would not have written this article and would have written against Paul:




David Wood, just like all other Christians, touches only a few of the prophecies. There are hundreds of prophecies that are very clear.


I request David Wood to read them carefully and accept the truth. If he insists on disbelief, then at least he should read the Muslim points before writing articles and wasting his own time attempting to deceive the readers. 



2 responses to “Muhammad in the Bible?

  1. Salam

    I am little confuse about prophecy of Muhammad in Gospel of John.Plz clearify it

    John 14 (New International Version)
    15″If you love me, you will obey what I command. 16And I will ask the Father, and he will give you another Counselor to be with you forever— 17the Spirit of truth. The world cannot accept him, because it neither sees him nor knows him. But you know him, for he lives with you and will be in you.

    Christian claims that “paracletos” which Jesus promised would come to his disciples from the Father did indeed come during the lifetime of his disciples. Muhammad came long after the deaths of Jesus’ disciples — over five hundred years.

    So it is not prophecy of Muhammad.

  2. Why use NIV? Because it deliberately uses words that proves their points. This translation is inaccurate. Living in you means being in their heart. See prophecy in 1 John 4 on the main page.

    Besides, the disciples fought with each other and differed a lot especially on the circumcission issue. Paul disagreed with Peter and Barnabas; this shows that they had no spirit in them.

    Holy spirit was there before man.

    The context is in 1 John 4, “Jesus predicted Muhammad” on the main page.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s